Shareholder meeting roundup (The extremely gossipy I-will-regret-posting-this-version of the meeting)

by Melody on March 24, 2010

Today was the annual meeting of Starbucks shareholders. From my stance, here’s what happened:  Early on, I walked in and met up with numerous people from digital strategy who were showing off MyStarbucksIdea.com.  I finally got to meet Colin Frolich on the brewed coffee team, who previously I’d managed to miss at an event here or there. In some ways, the part of the meeting that felt like seeing my ‘Starbucks family’ was meeting up with the SSC partners that I already know. I’m not going to call out everyone’s names because that would be indecorous, but I know a few partners associated with PR, and some digital strategy people, and a few coffee people, all of whom are wonderful. Obviously I have real soft spot for digital strategy because that is the place where Melody’s world most overlaps with Starbucks (outside of the sheer love of coffee).

The meeting started, and it was pretty short this year, (or at least it felt like it). Sheryl Crow performed a couple of songs.  Though it did feel a bit like watching 1990s era VH1, I still enjoyed it very much.

During the various executive presentations, the audience heard from Cliff Burrows, Annie Young-Scrivner, Michelle Gass, Howard Schultz, Troy Alstead and John Culver.  Unfortunately, Troy Alstead’s portion of the meeting, as always, is a snore. It’s not his fault that he gets the snore portion of the meeting. I suppose the financials of the corporation are sexy if you’re a large scale investor, or into that, but for me, unfortunately, he puts me to sleep. Again, not his fault, it’s just the material that he gets to deliver.

I was unable to listen to much of anything out of Annie Young-Scrivner‘s mouth because of her distracting attire. A bright purple outfit, and she appeared to be wearing no nylons, and shocking strappy huge high heel shoes that are not appropriate for much of anything other than perhaps a hot date with a rich man.  I was not the only one to be stunned by the shoes, as I sat near to @Smoovebcoffee who noticed them as well. The heels of the shoes double as weapon in case of emergency.

Michelle Gass rocked as always and wore a stylish red dress and appropriate conservative pair of low-heeled shoes.  She talked about Seattle’s Best Coffee’s growing world of possibilities with franchising coming soon, and increased partnership with other corporations such as Burger King and Subway.  It’s exciting to see Starbucks leverage this brand for increased financial growth, and bringing another coffee option to millions of customers. Anyone who knows me, knows that I’m a Michelle Gass fan.  She’s very smart and talented, and a long-term partner.  In all honesty, I think there is great opportunity with Seattle’s Best Coffee to deliver and expand high quality coffee to many more consumers without dilution of the Starbucks brand. If the Starbucks brand were placed in partnership with too many business like Subway and Burger King, the fast food stigma would permanently attach to the brand. Instead, with Seattle’s Best, the corporation has the opportunity for increased growth without consequential brand dilution.  Just my two cents.

[[Edit: I have another episode of StarbucksMelody.com featuring Michelle Gass. It is  Should Starbucks' Michelle Gass go on CBS' UnderCover Boss?]]

The question and answer period of the meeting was quite the disappointment.  Starbucks fielded three separate gun questions.  One person asked a question about Via in jars, which somehow seemed oddly familiar to being the identical question from the same person in 2009.

I genuinely was nervous. It’s way harder to talk to a large group of powerful business leaders than a small jury of random six Seattleites during a misdemeanor trial.  I had almost hoped that Howard would say something funny again (he’s quite good at that) but instead he was simply 100% professional.  I know that he is aware of this blog, but I really doubt that he is aware of the extent of my involvement with Starbucks. That’s okay though.  My question was a two-part question on Starbucks loyalty programs: “What lessons were learned from the rapid changing and evolving programs from 2008 to 2010? And what improvements will we see in the future for MyStarbucksRewards?“  Annie Scrivner-Young fielded the question who simply did NOT answer me and responded with a canned reply that customers want free drinks and did not want to pay $25 for a Gold card.  Actually her answer was hugely disappointing because it sounded like she didn’t listen to my question at all, and didn’t care.  There was NO attempt to even answer the second part of the question with what improvement might we see in the future with MyStarbucksRewards.  Nor at any time did she even attempt to talk about lessons learned from quickly-changing loyalty programs.  A more transparent answer might have admitted that it’s been confusing for baristas to go through a rapid metamorphosis of rewards programs.  (I still meet many baristas who really don’t understand them, and are unaware that you can receive ANY tall beverage free with a pound of whole bean coffee if paying with ANY registered card, loaded with money on it, at the green level of rewards or higher).

Former Starbucks partner Cindy nailed it when she described Annie’s answer as “canned“. The result was that I sat down feeling a bit low and thinking it hadn’t been worth it to embarrass myself in front of an audience of Starbucks leadership and shareholders.  That indeed was my least favorite part of the meeting.

After the meeting was over there was another round of socializing that left me in a whirlwind, and now headachey having not eaten for hours.  I ran across a friendly face from Starbucks PR department and made small talk with her for a while, somewhat awaiting an opportunity to pounce upon Howard Schultz for his autograph.  During this time, I met a bunch of new faces and I hope that at some later date I will still be able to place a name with a face.  Vivek Varma was introduced to me.  I confess I had no idea what to say to him, and it was clear that he was in a hurry, so it was truly a five to ten second, non-exciting introduction.  As I was waiting to catch up with Howard (far easier said than done), @CoreyDu came by and said “hello” to me.  He walked up and started talking to me in that tone of voice like as if I should already know him, and for a moment, I had no idea who he was.  Once he told me he was on twitter, I realized that we’re mutually following each other.  Suddenly it was like meeting an old friend. He was a very cool guy. Very real and kind, and easy to talk to. By the way, I do not say that about all the SSC folks who use twitter.  I can name many on twitter who seemingly are uninterested in engaging anyone who is ‘just a customer’.

Finally my chance came to meet up with Howard Schultz. Several weeks earlier, I had had some twitter conversation with @SBirr who is truly a huge Starbucks fan in Germany. I had asked him to send me a few items from Germany, and in exchange I told him that I would at least try to get Howard’s autograph on a card for him, because I knew he badly wanted this.  He had asked me if I was capable of getting this, and I explained to him that I would have to wait until the annual meeting and see if I could.  This was the moment I had waited hours for. I asked Howard if he would autograph something for me.  He seemed pleasantly professional about it, and said “yes” but “just one thing”.  I said, “No – TWO things” and whipped out of my purse a sharpie and two Starbucks gift cards for his autograph, one for me, and one for @SBirr.  Howard gave in and said, “okay”.  I thanked him profusely.  Following Howard’s signatures on my cards, he was whisked away into a meeting, and I left.

And that is all there is to tell of my trip to the annual Starbucks meeting.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • email
  • Google Buzz

Post to Twitter

{ 75 comments… read them below or add one }

ALN March 26, 2010 at 12:32 pm

Sorry the Q&A was disappointing – good news is you’ve got much of Starbucks’ attention from your blog, and maybe someone from corporate will be brave enough to give you the real answer!

Darth Sidamo March 26, 2010 at 4:09 pm

I think the lack of accountability comes from the fact that well…..there is no way to hold them accountable. My DM is terrible. From the second my first SM at my current store walked into the door he set her up to fail constantly. His constant micromanaging made it impossible for her to do her job correctly. His disallowing of letting her promote or hire people showed his lack of trust in her. Every move of hers was scorned. He would walk into our store almost every day, act rude to the baristas, tell us everything was going well and then 10 minutes later my SM would have a top ten list of things he hated most about us and our store.

He has no personal connection with any of the baristas and treats us like we are numbers. Upon going to a round table with him and the RM and RVP there I noticed a HUGE difference in the way he acted. He was joking around acting all friendly like we are his best friends. Much like a Step Parent at a family reunion. His policies have driven down our stores customer voice down to 25 percentage points lower in the past year than when I have started. The problem? How would anyone ever know how bad he is? All the RMs know is how he acts around them. You cannot call ethics and tell them that somebody is just bad at their job.

BOSTON STARBUCKS REBEL March 26, 2010 at 6:41 pm

Enlightened Coffee Sage,
I arrive at least 15 minutes early before my shift begins so that I can see if there is anything new on the Retail Portal. I so far have read all the relevant materials that is available. We also have a communications board located next to the partner belongings so that anybody can read them as they come in. Its amazing what one can do with 15 minutes. Also, you are able to get a partner beverage 30 minutes before your shift begins so why not use *gasp* 30 minutes to read the latest action items on the Portal.

Knowledge is power.

Enlightened Coffee Sage March 26, 2010 at 8:43 pm

BSR: I’m glad you have the time. Other people have second jobs and college and kids and lives.

What’s more, that’s also assuming that, if you come in early, there won’t be someone back there doing the schedule or the order or cash management.

We should not have to come in on our own time to hunt down information that the people in charge should be making sure that we find out. The fact that we are allowed to get drinks early for free has absolutely nothing to do with this at all.

Enlightened Coffee Sage March 26, 2010 at 10:02 pm

Oh, and by the way, there is a way to hold people accountable for this.

When a new promotion is in the works that the baristas should know about, the DM calls a store or two at random and asks to speak with a random barista. They then ask about the new promotion. If the barista knows about it, great! If they don’t know about it, they ask to speak with the shift and then ask why the hell that barista doesn’t know. If the shift didn’t know about it, the SM gets written up.

The RM does the same thing, but with a few stores across a district. If more than one store has ignorant baristas, the DM gets written up.

And, to top it all off, the folks in Seattle can send out their own spies on occasion to do the same thing with the regional managers.

After doing this once or twice, the fear of God will be instilled in everyone to ensure that information is being passed down.

It sucks to have to use fear as a motivating factor, but it’s an effective starting point. Once proper communication starts taking place, I’d be confident that customer satisfaction will start going up and proper communication will start happening, not due to fear, but because it’s a good idea and helps to bring success. Rather than having to scare people into making sure information is passed down, information will be passed willingly and even eagerly.

Melody March 28, 2010 at 12:36 pm

@ALN and EnlightenedCoffeeSage – Sorry I know this thread is getting a little old now but I wanted to reply to your thoughtful comments. @ALN – I hope you’re right, but I doubt I’ll be hearing from Annie Scrivner-Young – especially after getting on her about her shoes! LOL

@EnlightenedCoffeeSage – I like your idea about getting messages communicated to the ground level. I have a blog entry coming soon which essentially is ‘the common sticking points of My Starbucks Rewards’ (though I haven’t definitely decided on a title) because it’s an area where there is still enormous store-level confusion.

Enlightened Coffee Sage March 29, 2010 at 1:15 am

Melody:

Sorry if I keep ranting about this same communication thing (and I’m sure you’ll see me rant about it again), but it really is a big deal. This is an area where Starbucks is doing a horrible, horrible job, and both the baristas and customers suffer from it.

(However, my soon-to-be new manager agrees with me and has some ideas on how to make communication better, at least on the store level. Hopefully, between the two of us, we can at least make our store a little better informed.)

I do want to say, though, that I appreciate your decision to make a more positive counterpoint blog to Starbucks Gossip and think you made the right choice.

Starbucks Gossip, unfortunately, seems to be a pit of unrelenting negativity and ad hominum arguments. Over there, unfortunately, if you support and of Starbucks’ decisions, you’re a corporate shill and a brainwashed cultist slave. If you criticize any of Starbucks’ decisions, you’re a lazy, ungrateful whiny little crybaby who has no reason to complain about anything because you’re not a dirt farmer in some west African pit of a country, dodging machete attacks on a daily basis and dying of intestinal parasites at age 39.

As much as I rant and rave about labor and communication and believe that no small number of people in leadership positions in this company are stupid, evil, or both, I do love Starbucks, I recognize that there is good leadership in this company as well as bad, and I love what the idealists in the company try to stand for. And I like that you’ve made a little place for that.

purple1 March 30, 2010 at 12:43 pm

Very interesting about the response to your question about the new rewards program. It is very sad to see that SB corporate continues to do the canned responses. Certainly, there has been so many suggestions and comments to improve and revise the new program that you would think they would make some changes. I guess as I have said before on MSI – how does SB view their customer? What to them is the loyal customer? It seems the meeting did not answer any of these questions. Thanks Melody.

Dana March 30, 2010 at 7:14 pm

I am SOOOOOO jealous that you got to go to this. I love the question you asked because I think it’s what most of us are thinking. I’m just sorry you didn’t get a better answer.

Steve March 30, 2010 at 7:45 pm

In my opinion you didn’t miss too much Dana. It’s jusy a big feeding frenzy on free pastries that everyone handles and therefore has everyones germs on them. I watched it on their web cast and had the best seat in the hous since I was right up on stage and when it was all over I did not have to deal with all the crowds to get home because I was already home. Oh yes I was thoroughly disgusted at how they handled Melody’s question. Really showed lack of professionalism in my opinion.

Steve March 30, 2010 at 8:05 pm

How come the type is so small and why did it change? Also what does this mean?

Melody March 31, 2010 at 6:45 am

Starbucks managed to make my getting an autograph for Sebastian meaningless.
http://twitter.com/sbirr/status/11364145300

Sebastian had told me that he had written to Starbucks months and months ago asking for an autograph and got no response. Funny how they happen to find it and take care of that right after this blog post! Someone had to have read this blog post, recognized the name, and got right on it. Otherwise, that’s an amazing coincidence.
The good news is that Sebastian got a really cool autograph from Howard. I’m glad to see him so thrilled!

Melody March 31, 2010 at 10:51 am

About a year and a half ago, I had asked an SSC partner (who I genuinely believed was in the right position to help me get an HS autograph) to help me get his autograph on my card, because I wore out my Pike Place Card until it cracked in my hands. At that time, I didn’t have another signed card. This SSC partner told me, “no” and that it is “really hard to just slip Howard something to sign”. She firmly made it sound like Howard’s time was too valuable to sit around signing fan stuff (which is definitely a true statement). I didn’t push the issue, because I got a real “no” and understood why, but the timing of Sebastian’s fan autograph makes me certain that someone dug up Sebastian’s book upon reading my blog and …you know the rest of the story.

Sebastian March 31, 2010 at 11:32 am

Yes, you are right…that really is curious. They sent me the autograph on March 25. The meeting where you asked Howard for an autograph and told him of me, was on March 24, one day earlier.

You published this blog post on the same day…but did Howard sign my book on March 25? And they shipped it the same day? That would be fast…and then he must have been remembered by my name. I mean, he signed “For Sebastian” on your card and you told him that I come from Germany…and then he signed his biography one day later also for a Sebastian from Germany.

He is busy…he could have forgotten my name he signed your card the day before…but two Sebastians, both from Germany, on 2 days?!

Interesting…

BOSTON STARBUCKS REBEL March 31, 2010 at 12:07 pm

THREE WORDS: HOWARD THE COWARD

Cindy March 31, 2010 at 8:56 pm

@Melody – you are kind and generous. You went out of your way to help Sebastian get Howard’s autograph. Don’t let some SSC partners take that away from you. You shared your joy on Twitter and on your blog when you got the autographs, and someone from Starbucks tried to make you feel insignificant. You have a big heart, and Starbucks should embrace your passion for the company not try and disengage from you. We love your blog and many of us follow you loyally. Starbucks is lucky to have you as a fan.

Steve March 31, 2010 at 9:35 pm

Those were very nice and thoughtful words Meloday and you should feel proud and Starbucks and specifically Howard should feel ashamed for brushing you off at the meeting like they did without giving you a complete answer.

Why is this type all of a sudden so small? I can hardly see if I made a mistake or not.

Melody March 31, 2010 at 9:41 pm

@Steve – When I type a post the type is small, but it posts as normal size when you click the “submit” button. What’s happening for you? I’ll have to talk to the person who does that part of the blog for me. I have no idea. I see that I now have comment number napkins back too.

@Cindy – You completely understood every emotion that I was feeling with that comment of yours. Thank you. I hope that Starbucks won’t do things in the future with the aim of making super-fans appear insignificant. That’s not in keeping with being transparent, or respectful. I’ll chalk this up to an isolated incident.

purple1 April 1, 2010 at 5:18 am

I agree Melody. Have to add it is not only for you their number one fan but SB corporate should respond to every customer as if they were the most important customer to them.

Melody April 2, 2010 at 1:52 pm

@purple1 – I love what you said about how to respond to customers. Though I’m not totally sure I’m the #1 fan. I just have a blog, making me visible. Nob, who comments on this site might have me beat as a bigger fan!

As an aside, today in court during a recess, an assistant city attorney asked me, “how was the shareholders’ meeting” since she knows about my Starbucks addiction. When I got Sebastian’s card signed, I got another for me too – I might not have even tried to approach HS if it weren’t for Sebastian’s card. Anyway, I pulled the card out of my wallet that HS signed for me and showed it to the assisitant city attorney who oohed and ahhed over it. Despite not getting the responses that I wanted from HS and AYS, I am genuinely thankful that Howard never gives me a hard time when I approach him for an autograph. He manages to always be totally polite and genuine with me when I’ve spoken with him one on one. I truly appreciate that! It’s totally cool to be able to show off the card a week later with friends, and I thank Howard enormously for all the time he has spent talking to me (even though it’s a matter of seconds here and there) and the numerous times I’ve managed to get him to sign things. Howard is too busy to read this blog I’m sure, but I need to get this out there.

Skooter McGoo April 2, 2010 at 11:21 pm

Never underestimate that Howard wouldn’t have time once a week to scan Ur blog and find out what people are saying about the company. I know they have people reading all media whether it is blogs like this that BURST with joy of things in the world of SBUX or SG which tends to be vents/rants/weirdness in the store front lines, LOL The “honey” man story comes to mind because that’s a question I don’t ever want to ask. ha ha ha U keep on doing what makes U happy and the others be damned. I would rather have U in my corner than have U punching me at every turn.

Karl Dahlquist ~ karldotcom April 2, 2010 at 11:48 pm

I can attest to corporations reading online content. What has replaced the old clipping services of old are agencies that are hired to that track online news, corporate and private blog comments, tweets, television, etc. If something is deemed big enough, it is forwarded to the correct department…usually in a day or two.

Sebastian April 3, 2010 at 6:17 am

I think he will read thru your blog sometimes…if he really knows it, and that’s what I think.

And I also think he is getting the comments/ideas/complains of fans like us here on the blog very well…and I hope he is forming a view on all that.

Steve April 3, 2010 at 6:50 am

When I was working for the Dept. of Transportation the head honcho called district adminstrator (comparable to Howard) did not have time to read everything good or bad but certain people were asigned to read them and to summarize them and report to the dustruct adminstrator daily and it wes his job to know everything good or bad that was going on and so Howard should know EVERYTHINGthat is going on or writtren about Starbucks here or other places. That’s why he is getting paid the ridiculous salary he is.

Steve April 3, 2010 at 6:55 am

Gads two mistakes and I must have proofed it three times. Why is this type so small Melody which makes it harder to proof for older eyes? It wasn’t before you changed it..

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge

Previous post:

Next post: